Friday, March 27, 2020
Admission Essay Help for Boston University
Admission Essay Help for Boston University Essay Prompts Admission Essay requirements Essay is a part for undergraduate application. Graduate students can submit optional essay with any additional information for admission committee. Admission essay / personal statement prompts Essay is an important part of your application because it demonstrates what you think and how clearly you express yourself. It’s also an opportunity for us to learn who you are beyond your grades and standardized test scores and gives you a chance to explain circumstances that may reflect certain grades or choices in your curriculum. Let your voice come through in your essayâ€â€this will help us better understand what distinguishes you from other applicants. Informational guide video how to write an essay. Office of Admissions Contacts International students can email at Facebook: BUAdmissions Twitter: @ApplyToBU Instagram: @ApplyToBU Tumblr: applytobu.tumblr.com Pinterest: ApplyToBU Phone: 617-353-2300 Fax: 617-353-9695 Boston University Admissions 881 Commonwealth Avenue 6th Floor, Admissions Boston, MA 02215 USA Career Services Lisa M. Toby Assistant Dean, Career Engagement Office: Talbot, T113C East Phone: 617-638-4675 Email: Maria McCarthy Director, Advising and Career Development Office: Talbot, T113B East Phone: 617-638-4602 Email: LinkedIn University Ranking for Media ProfessionalsGraduate #13 for DesignersUndergraduate #21 Alumni statistics (Alumni data based) Where they live Greater Boston Area 71,766 Greater New York City Area 28,459 Washington D.C. Metro Area 7,530 San Francisco Bay Area 7,453 Greater Los Angeles Area 6,893 Where they work Fidelity Investments 611 IBM 585 Massachusetts General Hospital 542 State Street 452 Harvard University 439 What they do Education -19,366 Media and Communication -16,599 Entrepreneurship 14,317 Healthcare Services 13,082 Sales 13,050 Research 12,549 Operations 11,939 Information Technology 10,766 What they studied Psychology 12,778 Business Administration and Management, General 12,299 Economics 11,457 Political Science and Government 7,938 Computer Science 7,480 English Language and Literature/Letters 7,330 International Relations and Affairs 7,179 Communication, General 6,385 What they’re skilled at Microsoft Office 35,166 Research 33,890 Public Speaking 32,721 Management 31,941 Social Media 31,861 Leadership 30,451 Microsoft Excel 25,599 Strategic Planning 24,041 Colleen McCreary (formerly Wheeler) CEO, CCKPartners Consulting Senior Technical Recruiter Technical Support Manager at Microsoft Chief People Officer at The Climate Corporation Director, Corporate HR Diversity at Electronic Arts             BS, Mass Communication and Public Relations                                         1991 – 1995 Jeff Howe Visiting Scholar at MIT Assistant Professor at Northeastern University Contributing Writer at Village Voice Media Senior Writer at NewAssignment.net                        MA, Creative Writing                                2010 – 2011 Jonathan Bush CEO and Co-founder at athenahealth Medic at US Army Consultant at Booz Allen Hamilton                     1987 – 1988  Jay Adelson General Partner at Center Electric Member, Board of Directors at Defense.Net, Inc Chairman, Founder, CEO at Revision3 Founder, Chief Technology Officer at Equinix, Inc. B.S., Film and Broadcasting, Concentration in Computer Science  Recommendations to apply Great Systems Engineering School! I graduated from College of Engineering in 1991. BU had the best software systems engineering program in the country! Loved ever minute of it. The faculty was great, and provided an environment where it was not all academic, but practical business engineering projects and discussions. Good options were introduced as well through Harvard, specially the course on Engineering Management. Highly recommended. Imran Mirza President at Strategic Services Consulting | CD, BSc, MSc, ITIL, Prince2, MoP President at Strategic Services Consulting | CD, BSc, MSc, ITIL, Prince2, MoP 1989 – 1991, MSc
Saturday, March 7, 2020
A critical review on current debates about the effectiveness of self regulation of the UK press using the News Of The World as a case study The WritePass Journal
A critical review on current debates about the effectiveness of self regulation of the UK press using the News Of The World as a case study Introduction A critical review on current debates about the effectiveness of self regulation of the UK press using the News Of The World as a case study . The failure of self-regulation Perhaps the most significant condemnation of self-regulation stems from the current unethical (and illegal) practices which some journalists choose to engage in. Leading the way in underhand investigatory techniques was the tabloid paper NoW. Described by its owner James Murdoch as a crime fighter, it had a reputation for celebrity scoops and check-book journalism (08.07.11, BBC News). It was the desire to satiate its readership’s interest in this type of story which ultimately pushed it to commit serious violations of privacy. The first indications that it was engaging in phone hacking emerged in 2005 when the newspaper printed a story about a knee injury incurred by Prince William. Suspicions were raised as to how this information had been obtained and eventually the author of the article and an investigator from the paper were arrested and imprisoned for illegal phone hacking. To date the police have identified potentially 6,000 victims demonstrating the widespread extent o f this of crime (28.02.12, BBC News). Unable to sustain credibility the NoW closed in July 2011 under a torrent of allegations. The paper has had to pay out millions in damages to those whose privacy they compromised, including  £2million to the parents of Milly Dowler after it emerged that one of its journalists had tapped into the missing girl’s voicemails 28.02.12, BBC News). The inability of the Press Complaints Commission to prevent this type of journalistic behaviour, which reaches beyond the NoW, stems from a variety of factors. Unpacking current debate on self-regulation gets to the heart of these. Current debate over self-regulation In consequence of this scandal in November 2011 David Cameron convened the Leveson Inquiry to investigate the culture, practice and ethics of the press (24.04.12, BBC News). One of the findings that has emerged from the inquiry is that the Press Complaints Commission needs reforming. Lord Black, chairman of the body which funds it, told the inquiry that phone hacking has demonstrated that this institution lacks the investigative powers and the leverage needed to enforce editors to uphold their Code of Practice and apply punitive sanctions (01.02.12, BBC News). In a move which pre-empts the inquiry report the Press Complaints Commission announced in March 2012 that it would be closing and an interim body would take over until a new framework for a regulatory power can be put into place. This apparent failure of self-regulation has reignited the familiar debate as to how exactly the press should be regulated; can they be relied upon to implement it themselves or should some form of statutory regulation be resorted to? Cameron has indicated that the latter situation is not one he favours given that government regulation of the media does not lead to a free media (06.09.11, BBC News). He has not ruled out the idea however that independent regulation might function better if it was inaugurated through statute but kept removed from the government (06.09.11, BBC News). This would produce a body that is not dissimilar to Ofcom, which was created through statute and charged with overseeing the compliance of TV and radio to a code of practice. It is also an institution which firmly believes self-regulation can work for the press providing its governing council has ‘effective powers of enforcement and sanction’ and ‘genuine powers of investigation’ ( O’Carroll, The Guardian, 2012). Ofcom too believes that if self-regulation is to be viable then some aspects of it, particularly the rules governing membership, may have to be upheld by statute (O’Carroll). Other contributors to the ongoing debate about self-regulation have identified alternative aspects of the regulatory process which might be more effective if enforced by law. For instance O’Malley and Soley have argued that there is no reason why there should not be laws that guarantee the right to correction of factual inaccuracies in the press (O’Malley and Soley, p.2). Conservative MP George Eustice has come forward to say that a clearer privacy law which unequivocally balances the right to privacy against the right to freedom of expression would benefit both the public and the press (Eustice, The Guardian, 2012). Not everyone sees the phone hacking scandal as a failure of self-regulation. The Guardian’s Gill Phillip points the blame at internal management and the police for not investigating evidence they first obtained in 2006 (Phillips, 2012). The Press Complaints Commission, Phillips argues, was not designed to address criminal conduct (Phillips). If this situation was to be dealt with through more top-down regulation the result would be heightened complexity which would do no more than obscure the public’s rights and the press’ responsibilities(Phillips). Belsey certainly concurs with this standpoint arguing in Britain the media are already curtailed by the criminal laws of, to name a few, official secrets and sedition, by the civil laws of libel and breach of confidence, and as well as through the use of interlocutory or ‘gagging’ injunctions (Belsey, 1992, p. 6). Adding privacy to this list would have a damaging effect on journalism whilst in all likelihood having no impact on the gossip of tabloids. Furthermore legal restriction on the press will not only curb its democratic role but will also increase the instances when a journalist if faced with the dilemma of acting either legally or ethically (Belsey, p. 8; Harriss, 1992, p. 68). Conclusion – the way forward for self-regulation Self-regulation has been and continues to be undeniably flawed and this is typified by the activity of the NoW. This has been recognised and a significant overhaul of the system is on the agenda. Lord Hunt has proposed that the successor to the Press Complaints Commission should have two arms; the first should address complaints and mediation, the second should operate as an auditor which enforces standards and adherence to the editors’ code. Additionally a more pronounced effort should be made by newspapers internally to self-regulate through the appointment of individuals responsible for compliance (Greenslade, The Guardian, 2012). This would create a regulatory body which has the ability to demand a continued and unwavering commitment to ethical journalism. Ofcom too are confident that if this new body has a robust framework and the authority to impose sanctions on wayward newspapers, effectual self-regulation could at last be overseeing the activity of the press (Oâ₠¬â„¢Carroll). The case of the Press Complaints Commission illustrates that voluntary self-regulation has been little more than a token effort at control over the industry. The blame for this, Tunstall suggests and events corroborate, is with the government for not finding the courage to insist on a compulsory system (Tunstall, 1996, p. 391). In all likelihood the press may have to reconcile themselves with the idea that their membership to this yet undecided regulator will be made obligatory by law. Arguably it would be this new system which differentiates the upcoming regulator from those which have fallen in its wake, and differentiation is certainly needed if the same failures of the past are not to be repeated. Bibliography Belsey, A., ‘Privacy, publicity and politics’, in Belsey and R. Chadwick (ed.), Ethical issues in journalism and the media, Routledge, London, 1992 Harris, N., ‘Codes of conduct for journalists’, in Belsey and R. Chadwick (ed.), 1992 O’Malley, T., and C. Soley, Regulating the Press, Pluto Press, London, 2000 Tunstall, J., Newspaper Power, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1996 ‘News of the World: An obituary’, 08.07.11, BBC News ‘Cameron warns MPs against regulation ‘revenge’ on media’, 06.09.11, BBC News ‘Phone hacking scandal: Timeline’, 28.02.12, BBC News ‘QA; The Leveson Inquiry’, 24.04.12, BBC News Greesnlade, R., ‘Hunt’s plan for a new form of press self-regulation, The Guardian, 09.03.12 Phillips, G., ‘Press freedom v privacy: Time for parliament to draw the line? The Guardian, 30.03.12 Eustice, G.,‘A privacy law is vital for the future of the British media’, The Guardian, 08.04.12 O’Carroll, L., ‘Ofcom: press self-regulation could work’, The Guardian, 18.04.2012 All BBC News articles accessed at www.bbc.co.uk/news on 28.04.12 All Guardian articles accessed at www.guardian.ac.uk on 28.04.12
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)